EGOISM INSTEAD OF HUMANISM
Usually we are busy with our everyday local duties. So also politicians, journalists, intellectuals of all the kinds and of course people in general.Sometimes one and another responsible feeling world-citizen stands up, takes a little distance from the daily local rush and think on the world development with a constructive critical point of view. By this way, the first we discover is, that we are not educated like world-citizens that we in reality are, but as citizens of a certain country called nation and often with a unique language, special laws, state or nation borders, a national culture and more. Many privileged in the nation talk much about freedom and use the natural blue color of the sky and of the see to represent their ideology. They use the complicated meaning "freedom" to protect their owning and their privileges.
In the nature the strong animals dominates over the weak. Group leaders are usually strong animals. Human beans are also animals. Are they? Darwin and other scientists are sure. The common sense tells us also that we are developed animals. What do you think ? I think that we all on earth, are like brothers and sisters. We daily mix with each other and doesn't exist pure races. The big problem is that the privileged people behave constantly egoistic to protect their privileges. By the same way as animals: they elect leaders to lead them, they mark their territory, they construct armed forces to protect their territory, the fight for their group and more.
Humans are not animals, but they posses varying developed egoistic behavior. There are two main kind of people with egoistic behavior. The privileged people are educated and conscious about their egoistic behavior. They behave egoistic to protect their privileges. The other kind are more or less unconscious and they behave egoistic because they are an-alphabets with low developed knowledge standard. They believe in gods, they follows the leader like a god, they live isolated, they transform the traditions, they fight with their neighbors about the food and about attractive places and so on.
We have to stop all the egoistic behavior and the question is how and when are we going to start to discuss our egoistic behavior seriously and needed intensive? The education and with her the science developers higher rapidly and the number of scientists increases constantly. The question is: Why all those well educated world-citizens doesn't talk, doesn't care and doesn't protest strongly and enough on the international plan about our egoistic behavior ? All the thoughts to give an explanation to this phenomenon, results to the conclusion of only one meaning expressed with only one word. This word is egoism. We are afraid to loose our privileges and that is why we allow the egoism to take over our humanism.
Humanism doesn't mean to give more support to the pours. Humanism means we all to create international human laws that can guarantee all on earth the same Human Rights. To institute a first language for all on earth. to guarantee 9 year school for all on earth and to abolish all the boundaries.
15 ACTIONS TO RESCUE THE WORLD
15 ways which are absolutely needed, which are all ready slicing and unofficial on the way and which guaranteed can save the world. I am an elder but super modern political philosopher who means that the international political questions are most important and that is why must be discussed frequently and intensively plus they must have the highest and the first priority. I have very bad consciousness and I wonder what about the politicians, the journalists, the multimedia professionals, the professors, the experts and the potentates of all the kinds? Those doesn't come out with crystal clear messages in clear speech about what (earlier or later shall) must be done as it is presented here. Those prefer to wait and see and they postpone the action on the future without real reason. The high society and the establishment live a luxury life in wealth and doesn't care. The truth is that much more can be done all ready now.
I found this statistical article in Swedish translation in the Swedish newspaper ”Sekotidningen” published in Nr 4 week 17, 1999. The article was copied from the page The Web of Culture, www.webofculture.com . I searched there later but I could not any longer find the original. Now I translated it with my bad English.
THE EARTH AS A VILLAGE OF 1OO INHABITANTS. This statistic is a few years old, but the circumstances are still almost the same. Quote: ”...If we all on earth lived in a little village with 100 inhabitants, should exist: 21 Europeans, 57 Asians, 14 Americans, 8 Africans, 52 women, 48 men, 70 persons with different body color than white, 70 persons with other religion than Christian, 89 heterosexuals, 11 homosexuals, 70 an-alphabetic. The half of the inhabitants should be underfed and 59% of all resources should belong to 6 persons and all 6 should be citizens of USA. 1 person should have university education and 1 person should own a computer." End of quote.
”Human Rights in the ancient world", is the name of en article in Wikipedia. I wanted to know more about Human Rights and searched in the Wikipedia.I especially wanted to know why the politicians talks about Human Rights and not about Human Laws. Here comes the article: Quote: "Ur-Nammu, king of Ur in ca. 2050 BC created the Code of Ur-Nammu, the oldest legal codex that survives today. Several other sets of laws were created in Mesopotamia including the Code of Hammurabi (ca. 1780 BC), one of the best preserved examples of this type of document. It shows rules, and punishments if those rules are broken, on a variety of matters including women's rights, children's rights and slave rights.
The prefaces of these codes invoked the Mesopotamian gods for divine sanction. Societies have often derived the origins of human rights in religious documents. The Vedas, the Bible, the Qur'an and the Analects of Confucius are some of the oldest written sources that address questions of people's duties, rights, and responsibilities." End of quote.
One can read a lot about human rights there. Some article titles are: Human rights, Human rights sources, The United Nations, Europe, History of human rights, Human rights in the ancient world (copied above), Persian Empire, Maurya Empire, Early Islamic Caliphate, Human rights in early modern era, After world war II, International bodies, Regional legislation, Philosophy of human rights, Theory of value and property, Types, Justification of human rights, Criticism of human rights, Human rights violations, National human rights institutions, and links to about another 200 similar articles. Human rights are basic for the foundation of the international direct IT-democratic organization. The representative democratic political culture and the media culture, has trade, commerce, economy, money and talks about persons as main subject in the world of today. They should have human rights instead. It is unhuman to don't do enough for materialistic equality and for our many starving and hard suffering brothers and sisters in the world. We should be ashamed.
It is seeking a constructive-critical debate-explanation about the planning of the world for the next decades and about what must be done and in which order it has to be done. I consider that we must work, act and do whatever we can to:
@ legislate basic e-laws to replace the UNO with the UWO, (not existing yet www.United.Worldcitizens.Organisation.net or .org or .nu or similar.
@ legislate basic e-laws to abolish all the nations, all the nation flags, all the nation boundaries and all the leaders.
@ legislate basic e-laws to make it possible to all the members-world-citizens to propose laws and participate directly world public legislations.
@ legislate basic e-laws to guarantee food, home, health care, work, at least 9 years education and a computer to all world citizens.
@ legislate basic e-laws to allow only one child for each family and for all the parents of the world.
@ legislate basic e-laws to stop the production of not needed products as: weapon, alcoholic drinks,Tobago, narcotics and similar.
@ legislate basic e-laws to eliminate the influence (indoctrination) of the religions in the education system and in the public society.
@ legislate first international basic e-laws and all the other e-laws.
@ legislate basic e-laws to abolish all the military powers in the world
@ legislate basic e-laws to introduce direct democracy in all the organisations and in all the companies and to establish e-decisions.
@ legislate basic e-laws to abolish all business bosses and to transfer the leading to all the working people in the companies.
@ legislate basic e-laws to abolish the monetary system and thr commercialism and to replace those with e laws.
@ legislate basic e-laws to introduce the same first language and the same basic books in all the basic schools of the world.
@ legislate basic e-laws to introduce the subject direct democracy in the schools of the whole world.
@ legislate basic e-laws to stop living unneeded luxury life and to stop to ignore our brothers and sisters in the third world and to stop been unhuman.
A GOOD QUESTION: WHICH EMERGENCY PLANE HAS THE POLITICAL PARTIES AND THE SOCIETY FOR THE DAY WHEN THE WORLD-CITIZENS WILL STRIKE AND WILL DENY TO PARTICIPATE POLITICAL PARTIES AND TO SUPPORT THE PARTY LEADERS AND TO PARTICIPATE TRADITIONAL PERSON ELECTIONS AND WILL DEMAND TO LEGISLATE ELECTRONIC INTERNATIONAL BASIC LAWS?
DO YOU WISH TO WAIT AND SEE? HOW LONG? IS IT GOOD TO WAIT? AND IN THAT CASE WHY?
Fred blomson, fred.blomson@gmail.com,
www.fredblomson.spaces.live.com
www.elektronisk-globalisering.blogspot.com
www.world-org.blogspot.com
I am thankful for comments!
